Site Logo
Looking for girlfriend > Dating for life > The woman in black ending

The woman in black ending

Site Logo

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy , and our Terms of Service. It only takes a minute to sign up. She looks sadly at the now-dead family reunited and going on to heaven, indicating a longing to be at peace. However, her intense hatred keeps her from being at peace and as such, she will continue to haunt the village for the foreseeable future. Hence, we were given a sequel. It's been a while since i saw the movie, This is what i remember they try to lift the curse by burying the body of Jennet's son who was still left in marshes and doing so they assume that curse might be lifted but as we know later at the end of the movie it was a wrong assumption and as evidenced by the final scene the curse still isn't broken and we are left to assume that she is still in large haunting the village.


Up For Discussion: Let’s Talk About The End Of WOMAN IN BLACK

Site Logo

Aug 03, PM. I saw the movie and the ending was pretty good. Creepy and stuff. But the problem is I can't figure out what The lady in Blacks true intentions were? Did she do it to reunite them?

To spite him? And what happened to the lost children? Can someone explain it if the ending of the book clarified it?? The ending was changed for the film! Stick with the ending in the book as the author chose to end it if I were you. Out of interest did you read the book or see the film first? I suspect she did it to spite him. Her only intentions were to kill the son, not the father, so she wants him Arthur to suffer as she did.

At least that's my take on it. However the ending to the book is completely different, they changed quite a few things in the movie.

Though I'm told Susan Hill is much happier with this latest film than she was with the version. The book is really good though, if you haven't read it yet, you should.

Aug 04, PM. Sue wrote: "The ending was changed for the film! A good book often leaves the reader to think about the ending. You asked what happened to the children, we have to think about it and try to imagine. As for the woman in black. I don't think there was any compassion left in her. She was going to kill his son and chose her own time and place in the book, there was no happy ending as is concerned.

The film made the ending happier showing the ghosts walking off together as a family.. I had liked the book best as the reader is left to think about it and consider why. Aug 07, AM. In the movie she killed him and his son because she wanted him to be with his wife again almost a thank you gift. Aug 08, PM. I had read the book beforehand so maybe that influenced my thinking but I felt that for the ending of the movie which I didn't like the ending she was being revengeful as usual.

Aug 15, PM. Sue wrote: "A good book often leaves the reader to think about the ending. I don't think th IMO, the lady can be seen as a metaphor for a lot of things--a feminist allegory, an example of the effects of hypocritical Victorian social mores, etc.

I haven't seen the movie but have read the book a number of times and it's very much in the classic ghost story tradition of MR James etc. The ending of the novel doesn't leave much room for doubt about her motives - although she is a ghost she had also been driven mad with anger and grief, with no room for compassion.

She made other people victims of her madness but she had endured SO much pain, so was a victim herself. I think the book is brilliant :. Jan 03, AM. I read the book then watched the film, and absolutely couldn't stand the film. I felt it changed far too much about the story and found it rather predictable and boring. The original story provided by the book I found to be much more entertaining and intellectually stimulating.

In a nutshell I thoroughly enjoyed the read, but watching the movie felt like a chore. Jan 04, PM. Steph wrote: "In the movie she killed him and his son because she wanted him to be with his wife again almost a thank you gift" No she didn't,her intention was to kill the kid as she possessed him to go on the train track, it was only at the last minute that Arthur actually realised what was going on!

It definitely wasn't a "thank you gift" Feb 08, AM. Ending in the film was sanitised as ever. The book is much more brutal and in keeping with her curse. Probably considered too horrific for consumption and had to pass the censors rating? I haven't seen the film, but the book is fantastic had me looking over my shoulder when reading it.

I spent a few holidays in the north east of England, which is where I always imagine this taking place. Reminds me of the causeway out to Lindisfarne, the creeping mists - very, very atmospheric The ending of the book was unsurprisingly surprising i.

I also saw the stage play - the ending of that was pretty dramatic as well. Just read the book - it is well worth it, and the best of Susan Hill's "ghostly" offerings. Feb 09, AM. Andy wrote: "I haven't seen the film, but the book is fantastic had me looking over my shoulder when reading it.

I spent a few holidays in the north east of England, which is where I always imagine this takin The sense of isolation was pretty insurmountable. Eel Marsh sounds like a beautiful and eerie place to visit and definitely not the kind of place to live. Mar 23, AM. I thought much about the film was just awful.

Less would have been more. Don't want to give spoilers. The end was just terrible. In the book it was the most chilling part of all and that was ruined by the change in storyline and the constant overdoing of horror throughout the film.

But I guess as George RR Martin says, the books and the films are two completely different babies and we should try to appreciate both for what they are.

Mar 28, AM. Book ending was far more frightening than the film ending. Film ending came off bittersweet, which I didn't mind, except that it conflicted with Susan Hill's theme of the power of evil. Mar 30, AM.

Paula wrote: "Book ending was far more frightening than the film ending. Moreso I thought because the real horror was saved up for it. In the film I don't think the book ending would have worked with such power. Steph wrote: "In the movie she killed him and his son because she wanted him to be with his wife again almost a thank you gift" That's an interesting alternative interpretation though, I never thought of it that way.

Mainly because I read the book long before I read the film, and the film reminded me so much of the 'classic' Hammer horrors in tone that 'supernatural evil' was all I can think of.

Next time I watch the film I'm going to try and see if I can see that side too. I like both book and film, though in slightly different ways. As to the OP's question, most of the posters here have already covered it. If you're not familiar with M. Their consciousness has survived as bitter misery and anger over their death, so they like to share it around and don't really care who bears the brunt of it. At least that's how I interpret it.

Aug 09, PM. Loved the Daniel Radcliiffe movie and loved the book. Both were fantastic. I also loved the endings in both too. I found the book ending particularly eerie though. Sep 04, AM. I liked the book I couldn't sit through the entire movie as I was disappointed with the plot of the movie..

I wish they had kept it same as the book's plot. Also, the movie is quite slow, boring and dull Nov 13, AM. Nobody said that Artur didn't die in the book, he is older, successful, happily married, has a big family and good life. He writes a story himself about his awful experience in his younger days. The death of his first wife was indeed brutal but all the book is written from a secure now position.

I wouldn't want to read it otherwise. Feb 01, AM.

Subscribe to RSS

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. This is one uptight narrator. Arthur can't even say that bad weather makes him depressed without mincing around, we suspect with his nose in the air:.

A young solicitor travels to a remote village where he discovers the vengeful ghost of a scorned woman is terrorizing the locals. In London, solicitor Arthur Kipps still grieves over the death of his beloved wife Stella on the delivery of their son Joseph four years before. His employer gives him a last chance to keep his job, and he is assigned to travel to the remote village of Crythin Gifford to examine the documentation of the Eel Marsh House that belonged to the recently deceased Mrs.

You can change your city from here. We serve personalized stories based on the selected city. I am so lucky you are all a part of my life: Birthday girl Sunny Leone thanks fans and friends for their messages of love. Priyanka Chopra pens a heartwarming message for all the nurses for their service on International Nurse Day.

The Woman in Black Analysis

With the help of a fellow soldier, the women and children must fend off the spirit, and end her presence once and for all. When a group of orphaned children are forced to move from their home in London, caretakers Eve and Jean bring everyone to the desolate and eerie British countryside. It isn't long before Eve starts to sense that this house is not what it appears to be as the children in her care begin to disappear. As their house of safety becomes a house of horrors, Eve enlists the help of a handsome pilot to help investigate what is happening. Eve soon discovers that it may not be a coincidence that she has come to reside in the house inhabited by the Woman in Black. As it turns out, the woman in black had orchestrated the living circumstances by luring orphans and other youths to seek shelter and a safe haven during the war. After discovering that an unexplained evil may have been responsible for their being there, the children, along with the elders who took care of the needs of the frightful children, started vanishing one by one. It is at this point all theories and stories of the woman in black are no longer just stories.

The Woman in Black Tickets

I mostly enjoyed Hammer's Woman In Black , which did pretty good business at the box office this weekend. It was a very old fashioned spook story with a heaping helping of modern day jolt scares that often worked. More than that it was evocatively photographed, and while the lead performance by Daniel Radcliffe was sort of one note watery eyed , he successfully banished Harry Potter from my brain for 90 minutes. What I really liked was the film's themes of science versus superstition; set at the turn of the 20th century, the film has the old world of moors and ghosts being confronted by a new world of rationality and motorcars.

Read the full review.

Minor Plot hole: Why did the Jeromes think locking Lucy up was a good idea? Okay, it may have been out of their paranoia, but it's obvious in her death scene she used a lamp to torch herself to death. So why did the Jeromes leave her locked away unattended with necessary means to kill herself? We've established that the woman can find and kill children even if seen, so that was kind of stupid.

The Woman in Black Plot holes (by Comptinator)

The Woman in Black is on the National Curriculum for English and Drama, so some performances especially matinees and on weekdays are likely to have school groups in attendance. This play is not suitable for those with a nervous disposition or who cannot handle sudden shocks. Please be advised that there is a large possibility of school groups being present at The Woman In Black, especially for Monday to Thursday performances.

It is the second adaptation of Susan Hill 's novel of the same name , which was previously filmed in The plot, set in early 20th-century England , follows a young recently widowed lawyer who travels to a remote village where he discovers that the vengeful ghost of a scorned woman is terrorising the locals. A film adaptation of Hill's novel was announced in , with Goldman and Watkins attached to the project. During July , Radcliffe was cast in the lead role of Arthur Kipps. The film was planned to be shot in 3D before plans were scrapped.

The Woman in Black is a horror novel by Susan Hill , written in the style of a traditional Gothic novel. The plot concerns a mysterious spectre that haunts a small English town. A television film based on the story, also called The Woman in Black , was produced in , with a screenplay by Nigel Kneale. In , a theatrical film adaptation of the same name was released, starring Daniel Radcliffe. The book has also been adapted into a stage play by Stephen Mallatratt.

As a stepping-out film for Daniel Radcliffe The Woman in Black isn't very Well, not really, but the character's time has come to an end, which means that the  Rating: 7/10 - ‎Review by Eric Eisenberg.

Aug 03, PM. I saw the movie and the ending was pretty good. Creepy and stuff. But the problem is I can't figure out what The lady in Blacks true intentions were? Did she do it to reunite them?







Comments: 1
  1. Shakadal

    Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also idea excellent, agree with you.

Thanks! Your comment will appear after verification.
Add a comment

© 2020 Online - Advisor on specific issues.